1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 966 (1937)
 

SPALDING v. UNITED STATES

No. 7350-Y.

17 F.Supp. 966 (1937)

SPALDING v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

January 16, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Chevalier, Peeler & Wilson (by Joseph D. Peeler), of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., by E. H. Mitchell and Eugene Harpole, Sp. Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal.

YANKWICH, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The court decides the questions of law as follows:

1. Notwithstanding the assignment of the lease by the plaintiff, the interest retained by him expressed in royalty, is a valuable economic interest in the leasehold and oil, even if we consider it merely as a reservation of rent or royalty, under the principles announced in the opinion this day filed in Caroline Spalding v. United States (D.C.) ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases