1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 20 F.Supp.
  5. 20 F.Supp. 827 (1937)
 

THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES

No. 12144.

20 F.Supp. 827 (1937)

THOMPSON et al. v. UNITED STATES (QUANAH, A. & P. RY. CO., Intervener).

District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

October 19, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. H. Larimore, of St. Louis, Mo. (H. C. Barron and A. B. Enoch, both of Chicago, Ill., Robert W. Thompson, of Dallas, Tex., Baker, Botts, Andrews & Wharton, of Kansas City, Mo., and R. S. Outlaw, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for plaintiffs.

E. M. Reidy, of Washington, D. C. (D. W. Knowlton, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for defendant Interstate Commerce Commission.

H. C. Blanton, U. S. Atty., of Sikeston, Mo., for the United States.

R. E. Quirk, of Washington, D. C., for intervener.

Before SANBORN, Circuit Judge, and DAVIS and MOORE, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The facts out of which this controversy arises are, in substance, as follows:

The Interstate Commerce Commission in 1932, in a proceeding known as No. 17,000, Rate Structure Investigation, Part 8, Cottonseed, Its Products, and Related Articles, 188 I.C.C. 605, prescribed carload rates to be applied by rail carriers, including the plaintiffs, to the transportation of cottonseed, its products and related...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases