1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 26 F.Supp.
  5. 26 F.Supp. 39 (1937)
 

BASEVI v. EDWARD O'TOOLE CO.

26 F.Supp. 39 (1937)

BASEVI v. EDWARD O'TOOLE CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 16, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank, Weil & Strouse, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Morgan, Finnegan & Durham, of New York City, for defendant.

BONDY, District Judge.

Defendant's objections as to the sufficiency of the bill cannot be sustained.

The plaintiff's catalogues are books within the meaning and intent of the copyright statute, 17 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and therefore a subject of copyright, and every pictorial illustration therein is a component part thereof and is protected by a copyright of the catalogue. See J. H. White Mfg. Co. v. Shapiro, D.C., 227 F. 957; Mail & Express Co. v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases