1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 45 F.Supp.
  5. 45 F.Supp. 423 (1937)
 

RITHOLZ v. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION, ETC.

No. 605.

45 F.Supp. 423 (1937)

RITHOLZ et al. v. INDIANA STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION AND EXAMINATION IN OPTOMETRY et al.

District Court, N. D. Indiana, Hammond Division.

November 22, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watson, King & Brode, of Washington, D. C., and Melvin H. Specter, of East Chicago, Ind., for plaintiffs.

Omer Stokes Jackson, Atty. Gen., of Indianapolis, Ind., Ralph E. Hanna, Deputy Atty. Gen., of Indianapolis, Ind., and Wilbur F. Pell, of Shelbyville, Ind., for defendants.

Before SPARKS, Circuit Judge, and BALTZELL and SLICK, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In conformity with Equity Rule 70½, 28 U.S.C.A. § 723 Appendix, the court, having heard the parties and their counsel, makes the following findings of fact, the same being the facts alleged in the amended bill of complaint which are well pleaded and which are admitted by the defendants' motion to dismiss:

1. Complainants are residents of the State of Illinois, doing business as partners under the trade name of National Optical Stores...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases