1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 20 F.Supp.
  5. 20 F.Supp. 142 (1937)
 

COTTMAN CO. v. DAILEY

No. 2476.

20 F.Supp. 142 (1937)

COTTMAN CO. et al. v. DAILEY.

District Court, D. Maryland.

July 19, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marbury, Gosnell & Williams, Wm. L. Marbury, Jr., and Roszel C. Thomsen, all of Baltimore, Md., and J. Stuart Tompkins, of New York City, for complainants.

Joseph R. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daniel I. Auster, Sp. Atty., of New York City, and Bernard J. Flynn, U. S. Atty., and C. Ross McKenrick, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The subject-matter of this suit relates to the administration of the customs laws of the United States, and arises particularly under the Act of May 27, 1921, c. 14, § 201-212, 406, 407, 42 Stat. 11, known as the "Antidumping Statute." (U.S.C.A. title 19, §§ 160 to 173.) The principal object of the suit is to enjoin the defendant Collector of Customs from liquidating an entry at the Port of Baltimore of certain merchandise,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases