1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 20 F.Supp.
  5. 20 F.Supp. 1009 (1937)
 

YOSEMITE PARK & CURRY CO. v. COLLINS

No. 4165.

20 F.Supp. 1009 (1937)

YOSEMITE PARK & CURRY CO. v. COLLINS et al., Board of Equalization of California.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

October 25, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., amicus curiæ.

U. S. Webb, Atty. Gen., and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before WILBUR, Circuit Judge, and ST. SURE and ROCHE, District Judges.

ROCHE, District Judge.

The question in this case deals with the applicability of the "Alcoholic Beverage Control Act of the State of California"1 in all its taxing, licensing, and policing provisions, to the Yosemite National Park located within the territorial limits of California.

The answer depends upon the respective jurisdictions of the state and the United States over the Park, and this in turn revolves around the methods...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases