UNITED STATES v. UHL


18 F.Supp. 1010 (1937)

UNITED STATES ex rel. DI MIERI v. UHL, District Director of Immigration.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 3, 1937.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mario M. De Optatis, of New York City, for petitioner.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John Knox, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.


LEIBELL, District Judge.

On the argument, April 16, 1937, on the return of the writ of habeas corpus, the court dismissed the writ for reasons then stated. However, no stenographic record was made at that time. It now appears that the relator is appealing from the order dismissing the writ. I am, therefore, filing this memorandum so that the appellate court may have a record of the reason for my decision herein.

The return to the writ shows that the alien...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases