1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 16 F.Supp.
  5. 16 F.Supp. 976 (1936)
 

BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N. A. v. KING COUNTY

No. 1138.

16 F.Supp. 976 (1936)

BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N. A., v. KING COUNTY et al.

District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D.

November 12, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bogle, Bogle & Gates, of Seattle, Wash., for complainant.

Warren G. Magnuson and Edwin C. Ewing, both of Seattle, Wash., for respondents.

BOWEN, District Judge.

National banks are instrumentalities of the federal government, and states and counties are without power to tax the personal property of such banks. 12 U. S.C.A. § 548; Owensboro National Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U.S. 664, 19 S.Ct. 537, 43 L.Ed. 850; Chase National Bank v. Spokane County, 125 Wn. 1, 215 P. 374.

In Aberdeen Savings & Loan Association v. Chase, 157 Wn. 351, at page 372, 289 P. 536...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases