1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 973 (1936)
 

IN RE AGWI NAV. CO.

17 F.Supp. 973 (1936)

In re AGWI NAV. CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

November 18, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City, for petitioners.

Purdy & Purdy, Gilbert D. Steiner, Gazan & Caldwell, Emil Nunez, Silas B. Axtell, Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, Hunt, Hill & Betts, Edwin M. Bohm, Henry E. Coleman, Thomas A. McDonald, Charles E. Miller, Wolf & Jacobi, John Tilney Carpenter, Arthur C. Muller, Jr., Maurice Rose, Alfred W. Meldon, Lord, Day & Lord, Henry S. Miller, and William L. Standard, all of New York City, for claimants.

KNOX, District Judge.

This is a petition to file a claim nunc pro tunc in the Morro Castle proceedings. Objection is made on the ground that the statute of limitations, 46 U.S.C.A. § 763, has run, extinguishing the right. The pendency of the limitation proceedings did not suspend the running of the statute. Petition of Clinchfield Nav. Co. (The Northwestern) (D.C.) 26 F.2d 290; Kavanagh v. Folsom (C.C.) 181 F. 401; In re Oceanic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases