1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 16 F.Supp.
  5. 16 F.Supp. 936 (1936)
 

SCHICK DRY SHAVER v. DICTOGRAPH PRODUCTS CO.

No. 7870.

16 F.Supp. 936 (1936)

SCHICK DRY SHAVER, Inc., et al. v. DICTOGRAPH PRODUCTS CO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. New York.

October 31, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar W. Jeffery, Abraham Tulin, and Reginald Hicks, all of New York City (Cooper, Kerr & Dunham and George F. Des Marais, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Watson, Bristol, Johnson & Leavenworth, of New York City (L. A. Watson, C. V. Johnson, and E. R. Helferich, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a suit for the infringement of claims 1 and 13 of patent No. 1,721,530 issued to Jacob Schick on July 23, 1929, and claim 5 of patent No. 1,757,978 issued to Jacob Schick on May 13, 1930.

The plaintiff Schick Dry Shaver, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing unof the state of Delaware, and is the owner of the exclusive right to make, use, and sell, and to grant to others sublicenses to make, use, and sell in the United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases