1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 13 F.Supp.
  5. 13 F.Supp. 901 (1936)
 

MAIBOHM v. R. C. A. VICTOR CO.

No. 2305.

13 F.Supp. 901 (1936)

MAIBOHM et al. v. R. C. A. VICTOR CO.

District Court, D. Maryland.

February 26, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. B. DesJardins, of Church & Church, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

George L. Wilkinson and Howard W. Hodgkins, of Wilkinson, Huxley, Byron & Knight, both of Chicago, Ill., John W. Michael, of Bottum, Hudnall, Lecher, Michael & Whyte, of Milwaukee, Wis., and Edwin F. Samuels and Thomas W. Y. Clark, both of Baltimore, Md., for defendant.

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

The present suit is one for alleged infringement of patent No. 1,930,980, issued October 17, 1933, to H. C. Maibohm, application filed October 30, 1929, for a variable electrical resistor and switch. The plaintiffs are the present owners of the patent.

By stipulation the issue has been reduced to the question of the validity of the patent. Briefly stated, the patent is for the combination of a standard form of variable resistance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases