1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 16 F.Supp.
  5. 16 F.Supp. 880 (1936)
 

LINDSEY v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA

No. 765.

16 F.Supp. 880 (1936)

LINDSEY v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA.

District Court, W. D., Missouri, S. D.

October 8, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Ross, of Kansas City, Mo., and Walter E. Connelly, of Springfield, Mo., for plaintiff.

Michaels, Blackmar, Newkirk, Eager & Swanson, of Kansas City, Mo., and Mann, Mann & Miller, of Springfield, Mo., for defendant.

REEVES, District Judge.

This case was tried at Springfield on April 11th last. At the conclusion of the trial judgment was given for the plaintiff. At that time an oral opinion was delivered.

The importance of the decision was so great that I have found it proper to review the law applicable to the facts, which were not in controversy. For the purpose of this memorandum opinion and for a ruling that may be understandingly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases