1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 16 F.Supp.
  5. 16 F.Supp. 666 (1936)
 

REMINGTON RAND v. LIND

No. 2086.

16 F.Supp. 666 (1936)

REMINGTON RAND, Inc., v. LIND, Acting Regional Director of National Labor Relations Board, et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

September 12, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bond, Schoeneck & King, of Syracuse, N. Y., and Peck, Shaffer & Williams, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Floyd C. Williams, of Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel), for complainant.

Daniel B. Shortal, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Garnet L. Patterson, of Washington, D. C., for J. Warren Madden, John M. Carmody, and Edwin S. Smith.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

By consent of the representatives of the respective parties, decision upon the questions before this court has been held pending the conclusion of negotiations looking to a settlement to the matters in difference between the respective parties. The court is now advised that such negotiations have been ineffectual.

On July 11, 1936, the National Labor Relations Board issued its complaint against the Remington Rand, Inc., complainant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases