1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 16 F.Supp.
  5. 16 F.Supp. 499 (1936)
 

GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. v. GROSJEAN

No. 277.

16 F.Supp. 499 (1936)

GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. v. GROSJEAN, Supervisor of Public Accounts, et al.

District Court, E. D. Louisiana.

July 24, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monroe & Lemann, of New Orleans, La., for complainants and interveners.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., and Justin C. Daspit, Fred A. Blanche, and E. L. Richardson, Sp.Assts. to Atty. Gen., for defendants.

Before FOSTER and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges, and BORAH, District Judge.

BORAH, District Judge.

This controversy involves the validity of the chain store license statute of Louisiana. Complainant, an Arizona corporation which with its affiliates operates 106 stores in Louisiana and a total of 15,082 elsewhere in the United States and in Canada, initiated this proceeding by the filing of a class bill in which twelve other foreign corporations operating retail units in Louisiana intervened and became co-plaintiffs, praying that the tax officials...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases