1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 330 (1936)
 

SICKNER v. GREAT LAKES TRANSIT CORPORATION

No. 1912-A.

17 F.Supp. 330 (1936)

SICKNER v. GREAT LAKES TRANSIT CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. New York.

December 18, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Guttman, of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Sanders, Hamilton, Dudley & Connelly, of Buffalo, N. Y. (William M. Connelly, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.

RIPPEY, District Judge.

At the close of the testimony, defendant moved for a direction of verdict for the defendant as to the first cause of action, based on negligence, and decision was reserved. The jury brought in a verdict of no cause of action as to that part of the complaint. It is possible that this motion also went to the question as to whether a cause of action for maintenance and cure was established against the defendant. Whether it involved only the first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases