1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 312 (1936)
 

HURD v. COE

No. 57211.

17 F.Supp. 312 (1936)

HURD v. COE, Commissioner of Patents.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

December 10, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. Donnelly, of Detroit, Mich., and Eugene E. Stevens, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

R. F. Whitehead, Sol., for U. S. Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

LUHRING, Justice.

This is a proceeding by bill in equity under 35 U.S.C.A. § 63 (§ 4915, R.S.) wherein the plaintiff seeks an adjudication that he is entitled to receive a patent for his invention as specified in his claims 10 to 16, inclusive.

The invention relates to a locking mechanism adapted particularly for use in locking a spare wheel on an automobile on a suitable support.

In his specification, page 1, the plaintiff states the object...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases