1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 133 (1936)
 

BUTLER v. CARNEY

Nos. 6375, 6646, 6644, 6645, 6661.

17 F.Supp. 133 (1936)

BUTLER et al. v. CARNEY, and four other cases.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

December 2, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Hale, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in Nos. 6375, 6644, and 6645.

Edward R. Hale and Bennett Sanderson, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff in No. 6646.

Fox & Orlov, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff in No. 6661.

Francis J. W. Ford, U. S. Atty., and Arthur L. Murray, Sp. Asst. to Atty., both of Boston, Mass., Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Andrew D. Sharpe and Arthur P. Curran, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for defendants.

BREWSTER, District Judge.

These five suits were brought to recover taxes illegally collected under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, and the Act as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.

The case of William M. Butler et al. v. Carney, No. 6375, was begun by a writ dated April 22, 1935. Both processing taxes and floor stocks taxes are involved. The plaintiffs allege that they have filed claims for the refund of these taxes on the ground that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases