1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 16 F.Supp.
  5. 16 F.Supp. 115 (1936)
 

BUDD WHEEL CO. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION

No. 1041.

16 F.Supp. 115 (1936)

BUDD WHEEL CO. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Delaware.

September 2, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richards, Layton & Finger, of Wilmington, Del., Melville Church, of Washington, D. C., and Charles H. Howson (of Howson & Howson), of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and William J. Belknap and Arthur C. Beaumont, both of Detroit, Mich., for defendants.

NIELDS, District Judge.

Motion to dismiss the supplemental bill of complaint as amended.

The grounds of the motion are that the Smith reissue letters patent No. 19,010 is prima facie invalid because of laches in thirteen years' delay in applying therefor, and, further, that the supplemental bill of complaint as amended fails to set forth specific facts and circumstances justifying such delay.

A brief reference to the reissue statutes is illuminating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases