1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 75 F.2d
  5. 75 F.2d 907 (1935)
 

JOHN W. GOTTSCHALK MFG. CO. v. SPRINGFIELD WIRE & TINSEL CO.

No. 2940.

75 F.2d 907 (1935)

JOHN W. GOTTSCHALK MFG. CO. et al. v. SPRINGFIELD WIRE & TINSEL CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

February 15, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George P. Dike, of Boston, Mass. (Robert M. Barr, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

J. Lewis Stackpole, of Boston, Mass. (Franklin G. Neal, of Springfield, Mass., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellee has filed a motion in this case, in which the Sedgley patent and Gottschalk and Grater patents were sued upon, asking that our order of January 4, 1935, be modified by striking therefrom the words "the appellants recover costs of appeal," and inserting in their stead "the appellants recover no costs"; and that as to the Gottschalk and Grater patents the appellee be allowed to "recover its costs of appeal."

The claims of the Sedgley...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases