1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 12 F.Supp.
  5. 12 F.Supp. 876 (1935)
 

MIDWEST MFG. CO. v. STAYNEW FILTER CORPORATION

No. 771.

12 F.Supp. 876 (1935)

MIDWEST MFG. CO., Inc., v. STAYNEW FILTER CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. New York.

November 18, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur F. Robert, of Louisville, Ky., and Edward H. Cumpston, of Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff.

John Van Voorhis' Sons, of Rochester, N. Y. (Strauch & Hoffman, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves by separate motions (1) to compel the defendant to serve a bill of particulars; (2) to strike out certain paragraphs of the answer; and (3) to strike certain of defendant's interrogatories.

It is important at the outset to have a general idea of the matters at issue. The suit is for the infringement of patent No. 1,521,575, an improvement in filters for purifying air. The application for the patent was filed in 1921...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases