1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 836 (1935)
 

UNITED STATES v. HOUDE ENGINEERING CORPORATION

No. 1904.

9 F.Supp. 836 (1935)

UNITED STATES v. HOUDE ENGINEERING CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. New York.

January 25, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George L. Grobe, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Buffalo, N. Y., Robert B. Watts, Sp. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board and Sp. Asst. Dist. Atty., of New York City, and F. B. Critchlow, Sp. Asst. Dist. Atty., and Thomas J. Emerson, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, both of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Edward W. Hamilton, of Buffalo, N. Y., for petitioner.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a motion upon the petition of one Joseph W. Dambach for permission to him to intervene as a party defendant. The proper practice on an application for intervention is by filing the petition accompanied by proposed answer and asking leave of the court for a hearing upon the petition. The special reason for the observance of this procedure is to enable the court to consider the sufficiency of the answer as bearing upon the right to intervene...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases