1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 12 F.Supp.
  5. 12 F.Supp. 753 (1935)
 

VIBRATION SPECIALTY CO. v. BALANCING SERVICE CO.

No. 1123.

12 F.Supp. 753 (1935)

VIBRATION SPECIALTY CO. et al. v. BALANCING SERVICE CO. et al.

District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D.

November 14, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Bliven, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

G. Wright Arnold and Clinton L. Mathis, both of Seattle, Wash., and Hayden, Metzger & Blair and A. E. Blair, all of Tacoma, Wash., for defendants.

BOWEN, District Judge.

In the case of Edison Phonograph Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co. (C.C.) 120 F. 305, it was held that "a bill for infringement of three separate patents is not subject to demurrer for multifariousness where it alleges that the things patented are capable of conjoint use, and are in fact so used in the apparatus of defendant, and the patents, of which profert is made, contain nothing inconsistent with such averment." (Syllabus). See, also, Union...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases