1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 14 F.Supp.
  5. 14 F.Supp. 626 (1935)
 

PHILAD CO. v. MURRAY'S BEAUTY SALON

No. 850.

14 F.Supp. 626 (1935)

PHILAD CO. et al. v. MURRAY'S BEAUTY SALON et al.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

November 7, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter W. Schwaab, of Cincinnati, Ohio, Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, and T. Paul Titus, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Carl W. Frey, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Maurice S. Cayne, of Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

NEVIN, District Judge.

Patent Infringement.

This is a suit under the patent laws of the United States. At the time the bill of complaint was filed, plaintiff, the Philad Company, was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Ohio. On or about December 24, 1934, the Ohio corporation transferred all of its assets, including the patent in suit, to the Philad Company, a corporation of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases