1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 36 F.Supp.
  5. 36 F.Supp. 548 (1935)
 

GOODRICH v. FORD MOTOR CO.

No. 6249.

36 F.Supp. 548 (1935)

GOODRICH v. FORD MOTOR CO.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

August 20, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Swan, Frye & Hardesty, of Detroit, Mich. (William M. Swan, Francis D. Hardesty, and John C. L. Cowen, all of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Bodman, Longley, Bogle, Middleton & Farley, of Detroit, Mich. (Frank Parker Davis, of Chicago, Ill., and I. Joseph Farley, and Thomas J. Hughes, both of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for defendant.

RAYMOND, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges infringement of each of the three claims of patent No. 1,285,129, issued to him November 19, 1918, upon application filed May 26, 1917, for "multicylinder engine". His claim is that defendant, by introduction of a new manifolding system in its 1934 and 1935 models, has adopted the essential teachings of the patent in suit. Manifolding as here used refers to that part of a multicylinder engine which effects distribution of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases