1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 11 F.Supp.
  5. 11 F.Supp. 571 (1935)
 

WITTNEBEL v. LOUGHMAN

11 F.Supp. 571 (1935)

WITTNEBEL v. LOUGHMAN.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 26, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Breed, Abbott & Morgan, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Dunlap, Otto & McGovern, of New Rochelle, N. Y., for defendant.

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The suit is in equity by a stockholder of a failed national bank against the receiver to obtain inspection of the books and records of the bank. The receiver's motion to dismiss the amended bill was denied. Wittnebel v. Loughman (D. C.) 9 F.Supp. 465. The receiver then answered. The present motion is by the plaintiff to strike out the separate defense set forth in the answer as insufficient in law; also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases