1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 34 (1935)
 

ARKANSAS-LOUISIANA PIPE LINE CO. v. COVERDALE

No. 615.

17 F.Supp. 34 (1935)

ARKANSAS-LOUISIANA PIPE LINE CO. v. COVERDALE, Sheriff.

District Court, W. D. Louisiana, Monroe Division.

Rehearing Granted July 26, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blanchard, Goldstein, Walker & O'Quin and Robert Roberts, Jr., all of Shreveport, La., for complainant.

A. L. Davenport and J. B. Dawkins, both of Monroe, La., Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., and J. C. Daspit, Fred A. Blanche, and E. L. Richardson, all of Baton Rouge, La., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS and BORAH, District Judges.

DAWKINS, District Judge.

In this case, identical provisions of the Act No. 6 of the Louisiana Legislature for the year 1932 are attacked as unconstitutional for the same reasons urged in the case of Union Sulphur Company v. Reid, Sheriff and Tax Collector et al. (D. C.) 17 F.Supp. 27, No. 618 in equity, this day decided, and on the additional ground that they impose an undue burden upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases