1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 12 F.Supp.
  5. 12 F.Supp. 416 (1935)
 

GROSVENOR-DALE CO. v. BITGOOD

Nos. 2479, 2480, 2478.

12 F.Supp. 416 (1935)

GROSVENOR-DALE CO. v. BITGOOD, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue. FLOYD CRANSKA CO. v. SAME. HARTFORD PROVISION CO. v. SAME.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

On Rehearing October 16, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Swan, Keeney & Smith, of Providence, R. I., for Grosvenor-Dale Co.

Robinson, Robinson & Cole, of Hartford, Conn. (Lucius F. Robinson, Jr., of Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for Floyd Cranska Co.

Samuel Steinberg, of Hartford, Conn., for Hartford Provision Co.

Robert P. Butler, U. S. Atty., and George H. Cohen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn., and James E. Murphy, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for Collector of Internal Revenue.

HINCKS, District Judge.

These cases come before the court upon petitions for preliminary injunctions restraining the collection of process taxes, etc., under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, as amended (7 USCA § 601 et seq.). In each case, the defendant has moved to dismiss the bill on the ground (inter alia) that the court is without jurisdiction to grant the relief sought. Precisely the same questions are involved as those upon which I ruled in my memorandum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases