LARABEE FLOUR MILLS CO.
v.
NEE, and twenty-three other cases.
District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 3, 1935.
October 3, 1935.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
McCune, Caldwell & Downing, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2725.
A. Z. Patterson and D. C. Chastain, both of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2730.
Cecil H. Haas, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiffs in Nos. 2733 and 2734.
Philip L. Levi, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2738.
E. S. McAnany, of Kansas City, Kan., for plaintiff in No. 2739.
Mann, Mann & Miller, of Springfield, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2741.
McReynolds & Flanigan, of Carthage, Mo., for plaintiffs in Nos. 2742, 2746, 2748, and 2749.
Glen A. Wisdom, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiffs in Nos. 2743-2745 and 2762.
Hunt C. Moore, A. F. Smith, and George T. Aughinbaugh, all of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2747.
Mercer Arnold, of Joplin, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2750.
David S. Alper and Max A. Patten, Jr., both of Joplin, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2751.
Burrus & Burrus, of Independence, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2752.
Elias Berell and W. I. Farmer, both of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2754.
Charles M. Grayston, of Joplin, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2755.
Conrad & Durham, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2765.
Matthew H. Galt and Wm. D. Tatlow, both of Springfield, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2766.
Charles M. Grayston, of Joplin, Mo., for plaintiff in No. 2771.
Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Thomas A. Costolow, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant in all cases.
District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.
OTIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff's bill in each of these cases alleges that the plaintiff is subject to the processing tax provided for in the Agricultural Adjustment Act (48 Stat. 31, as amended, title 7, U. S. C. § 601 et seq.); that demand has been made by the defendant that it pay the tax; that the provision for the tax in the act is invalid because beyond the constitutional authority of the Congress. The bill prays that the defendant be enjoined from collecting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
