1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 11 F.Supp.
  5. 11 F.Supp. 27 (1935)
 

MURRAY v. TRANSIT COMMISSION

11 F.Supp. 27 (1935)

MURRAY v. TRANSIT COMMISSION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 4, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Boston & Owen, of New York City (Carl M. Owen and Mark F. Hughes, both of New York City, of counsel), for receiver.

John J. Curtin, of New York City (John J. Curtin and Winfield S. Palmer, both of New York City, of counsel), Sp. Counsel for Transit Commission.

MACK, Circuit Judge.

In addition to the suit which the Transit Commission has brought in the New York Supreme Court in the name and on behalf of the city of New York, the further prosecution of which has this day been enjoined, American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 11 F.Supp. 26, the Commission has brought a statutory proceeding in the state court in its own name against the Interborough Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases