1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 13 F.Supp.
  5. 13 F.Supp. 340 (1935)
 

SWIFT & CO. v. RAY SALES CO.

13 F.Supp. 340 (1935)

SWIFT & CO. v. RAY SALES CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 21, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Hoge, of New York City (Edward S. Rogers, of New York City, William T. Woodson, of Chicago, Ill., and Clifton Cooper, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Newman, Hauser & Teitler, of New York City (S. L. Teitler, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

There are fifteen things in this case which are either undisputed or are satisfactorily proved:

1. The plaintiff's articles include numerous by-products of the meat packing industry. Among them from time to time have been soaps, shampoos, and cleansers. These, as it seems to me, come within the general class of toilet goods.

2. The defendant has or has had seven articles. These are shaving cream, dental cream, face cream, foot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases