1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 11 F.Supp.
  5. 11 F.Supp. 153 (1935)
 

SINCLAIR REFINING CO. v. MARTIN & SCHWARTZ

No. 1869.

11 F.Supp. 153 (1935)

SINCLAIR REFINING CO. v. MARTIN & SCHWARTZ, Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

June 10, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Slee, O'Brian, Hellings & Ulsh, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds (by Dean S. Edmonds and Raymond F. Adams), all of New York City, for plaintiff.

Albert R. Henry and Wilcox & Van Allen (John W. Van Allen, of counsel), all of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This action is brought to restrain the defendant from further infringing the rights claimed to be secured to the plaintiff by letters patent No. 1,948,191 covering certain improvements relating to a price indicator, and to recover damages suffered by reason of the alleged infringement by the defendant. The defenses are noninfringement, invalidity of the patent over the prior art, and misconduct of the plaintiff in the course of the prosecution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases