1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 12 F.Supp.
  5. 12 F.Supp. 1008 (1935)
 

DYKEMA v. LIGGETT DRUG CO.

No. 1967.

12 F.Supp. 1008 (1935)

DYKEMA v. LIGGETT DRUG CO., Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

November 21, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Locke, Babcock, Hollister & Brown, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Byrnes, Stebbins & Blenko, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Dudley, Stowe & Sawyer, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Watson, Bristol, Johnson & Leavenworth, of New York City, for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Defendant has filed a motion for further and better particulars as to certain matters stated in the bill of complaint. The suit is for patent infringement. The motion is made under Equity Rule 20. Plaintiff objects to answering certain inquiries. These all relate to the particular allegation in the bill of complaint, which reads: "8. The said patented invention, which is of great utility and value, has been extensively applied to practical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases