1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 988 (1934)
 

IN RE PARAMOUNT PUBLIX CORPORATION

7 F.Supp. 988 (1934)

In re PARAMOUNT PUBLIX CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 22, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Root, Clark, Buckner & Ballantine, of New York City, for trustee.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City, for bondholders' committee.

Nathan Burkan, of New York City, for creditors' committee.

Edwin L. Garvin, of New York City, for petitioning creditors.

Cook, Nathan & Lehman, of New York City, for stockholders' protective committee.

Szold & Brandwen, of New York City, for independent bondholders' committee.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

Uniontown Claims.

The master and all creditors, as well as stockholders, who have appeared are convinced that the proposed compromise would be beneficial to the estate. There is no dissenting voice. At the motion part on August 15 the representatives of a large group of creditors — having claims against the debtor, as I recall, of upwards of $30,000,000 — were unanimous in urging approval. So far as I can discover, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases