1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 8 F.Supp.
  5. 8 F.Supp. 897 (1934)
 

UNITED STATES v. REPUBLIC OIL REFINING CO.

8 F.Supp. 897 (1934)

UNITED STATES et al. v. REPUBLIC OIL REFINING CO. SAME v. HARTOL PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 17, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harlan Besson, U. S. Atty., of Trenton, N. J., W. B. W. Snyder and Morris R. Clark, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Robert L. Stern, Sp. Atty., of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., Ira C. Houck, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and George G. Tennant, Jr., of Jersey City, N. J., for defendant Republic Oil Refining Co.

Merritt Lane, of Newark, N. J., Todd Lee Wynne, of Athens, Tex., and H. Victor Crawford, of New York City, for defendant Hartol Products Corporation.

FORMAN, District Judge.

On October 6, 1934, a bill of complaint was filed in the case wherein the Republic Oil Refining Company was named as defendant.

In brief the bill recites that pursuant to the provisions of title 1, § 9 (c) of an Act of Congress, approved June 16, 1933, known as the National Industrial Recovery Act (15 USCA § 709(c) the President of the United States is authorized to prohibit the transportation in interstate commerce of petroleum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases