1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 23 F.Supp.
  5. 23 F.Supp. 869 (1934)
 

LATOUR CORPORATION v. E. B. LATHAM CO.

23 F.Supp. 869 (1934)

LATOUR CORPORATION v. E. B. LATHAM CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 11, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, and William H. Davis, of New York City, and William H. Taylor, of St. Albans, L. I., N. Y., for plaintiff.

Cooper, Kerr & Dunham, of New York City, and Drury W. Cooper, of New York City, Cornelius D. Ehret, of Philadelphia, Pa., and C. Blake Townsend and H. Frank Wiegand, both of New York City, for defendant.

BONDY, District Judge.

The bill of complaint alleges the infringement of Claims 1, 11, 15 and 18 of Reissue Patent No. 16,461, and Claims 9 and 11 of Patent No. 1,614,136, granted to the plaintiff as assignee of Marius C. A. Latour.

The suit is defended by Atwater Kent Manufacturing Company which manufactured the defendant's accused Atwater-Kent Receiver Model No. 35.

The reissue patent relates to a radio broadcast receiver combining multi-stage radio...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases