1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 859 (1934)
 

LEWIS INVISIBLE STITCH MACHINE CO. v. POPPER

Nos. 6869, 6989.

5 F.Supp. 859 (1934)

LEWIS INVISIBLE STITCH MACHINE CO. v. POPPER et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

February 5, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor D. Borst, of New York City, and S. George Tate, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Mock & Blum, of New York City, for defendants.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

On consent, the two above entitled actions were consolidated on the trial.

These are suits for alleged patent infringement, the first based on patent No. 1,891,308, issued by the United States Patent Office to Horace F. Gruman, assignor to Lewis Invisible Stitch Machine Company, for combined seaming and pinking machine, granted December 20, 1932; the second based on patent No. 1,909,346, issued by the United States Patent Office to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases