1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 8 F.Supp.
  5. 8 F.Supp. 844 (1934)
 

UNITED STATES v. E. & S. MOTOR TRANSP. CO.

8 F.Supp. 844 (1934)

UNITED STATES v. E. & S. MOTOR TRANSP. CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 1, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Conboy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Earl N. Bishopp, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Middletown, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.

Leo M. Brimmer, of New York City (Alexander, Ash & Jones, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Sun Indemnity Co. of New York.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The allegations of paragraphs 3 to 6 of the complaint, which were in part denied in the answer, have been satisfactorily established by affidavits. Indeed, their truth is now conceded in the brief of the defendants. The defense in paragraph 7 of the answer that there was no demand prior to suit was withdrawn by the defendants at the oral argument and has not been mentioned in the defendants' brief. This leaves for determination only the question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases