1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 6 F.Supp.
  5. 6 F.Supp. 818 (1934)
 

FRETWELL v. GILLETTE SAFETY RAZOR CO.

No. 1009.

6 F.Supp. 818 (1934)

FRETWELL v. GILLETTE SAFETY RAZOR CO.

District Court, D. Delaware.

May 10, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., Herbert J. Jacobi, of Washington, D. C., and Israel H. Perskin, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff.

E. Ennalls Berl (of Ward & Gray), of Wilmington, Del., and George P. Dike (of Macleod, Calver, Copeland & Dike), of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

NIELDS, District Judge.

This is the usual bill in equity charging Gillette Safety Razor Company with infringement of United States letters patent No. 1,407,930, granted to Julian W. Fretwell, the plaintiff, September 11, 1923. The invention is stated by the patentee to be for "new and useful Improvements in Locked Razors." The defense is noninfringement.

What did Fretwell contribute to the art? He testified to observing that inmates of jails and asylums were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases