1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 6 F.Supp.
  5. 6 F.Supp. 793 (1934)
 

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. v. BROOKLYN W. HEEL CORP.

No. 6511.

6 F.Supp. 793 (1934)

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION v. BROOKLYN WOOD HEEL CORPORATION.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 11, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave, of New York City (Hector M. Holmes and H. L. Kirkpatrick, both of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Macleod, Calver, Copeland & Dike, of Boston, Mass. (George P. Dike and Cedric W. Porter, both of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for defendant.

GALSTON, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit in which infringement is alleged of letters patent granted to Willard N. Sawyer, May 31, 1932, No. 1,860,789, on an application filed January 12, 1927.

The patent relates to a wood heel grooving machine and is concerned with the making of wood heels of the Louis type, as distinguished from the Cuban heel. The latter is relatively simple. The former is more difficult to manufacture, is more highly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases