1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 765 (1934)
 

ROTTEL v. YORKSHIRE INS. CO.

No. 2934.

7 F.Supp. 765 (1934)

ROTTEL et al. v. YORKSHIRE INS. CO. OF ENGLAND.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

August 14, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. H. Morosini and Kelly, Balentine, Fitzgerald & Kelly, all of Scranton, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Welles, Mumford & Stark, of Scranton, Pa., for defendant.

WATSON, District Judge.

This suit was instituted by Dominick Rottel and Anthony Rottel against the Yorkshire Insurance Company of England, to recover on a policy of fire insurance in the sum of $5,000. At the trial of the case before the court and a jury, at the close of plaintiffs' case, defendant moved for a compulsory nonsuit. Upon this motion the court granted a nonsuit, and also granted a rule to show cause why the nonsuit should not be stricken off. This rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases