1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 8 F.Supp.
  5. 8 F.Supp. 66 (1934)
 

POTTER v. HOOK SCRAPER CO.

8 F.Supp. 66 (1934)

POTTER et al. v. HOOK SCRAPER CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 31, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard B. Zeisler, of New York City, for complainants.

C. A. Weed, of New York City, for Hook Scraper Co.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

In order for this court, over objection, to retain the suit, it is certain that at least one defendant either (1) must be an inhabitant of this district, or (2) must have committed an act of infringement, as well as have a regular and established place of business, in this district. Judicial Code, § 48 (28 USCA § 109). I am uncertain whether the plaintiff rests its position, that there is venue in this district, on the first or on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases