1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 707 (1934)
 

ESDORN v. BROOKLYN MOULDING CO.

Nos. 7044, 7045.

7 F.Supp. 707 (1934)

ESDORN et al. v. BROOKLYN MOULDING CO., Inc. SAME v. M. GREENSPAN & CO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 21, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Munn, Anderson, Stanley, Foster & Liddy, of New York City (T. Hart Anderson, Orson D. Munn, and Daniel H. Kane, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

John D. Morgan, of New York City (H. N. Durham and Martin T. Fisher, both of New York City, of counsel), for Brooklyn Moulding Co., Inc.

Maurice H. Matzkin, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (J. G. M. Browne, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for M. Greenspan & Co., Inc.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The two above-entitled suits were brought by the same plaintiffs against different defendants, for alleged infringement of the same patent, and by consent were tried together.

The above-entitled suits are based upon patent No. 1,902,769, issued to John H. Esdorn, for Store Fixture Display Moulding, dated March 21, 1933, on an application filed February 18, 1932.

The plaintiff John...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases