1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 693 (1934)
 

SIEGEL v. WAYNESBORO KNITTING CO.

7 F.Supp. 693 (1934)

SIEGEL v. WAYNESBORO KNITTING CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 16, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lauterstein & Conroy, of New York City (Emanuel Dannett and Joseph Francis Finnegan, both of New York City, of counsel), for the motion.

Otterbourg, Steindler & Houston, of New York City (Charles A. Houston, of New York City, of counsel), opposed.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion is in all respects denied.

I. This suit is brought by the assignee of Eday Fabrics, Inc., a corporation of New Jersey, against the Waynesboro Knitting Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania. The amount involved is in excess of the statutory requirement of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and this court, therefore, has subject-matter jurisdiction of the case on the ground...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases