1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 639 (1934)
 

AMAZON PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. RAILROAD COMMISSION

Nos. 632, 635.

5 F.Supp. 639 (1934)

AMAZON PETROLEUM CORPORATION et al. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al. PANAMA REFINING CO. et al. v. RYAN et al.

District Court, E. D. Texas, Tyler Division.

February 12, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saye, Smead & Saye, of Longview, Tex., F. W. Fischer, of Tyler, Tex., and W. Edward Lee, of Longview, Tex., for plaintiffs.

James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., for defendant Railroad Commission.

Charles I. Francis and Douglas Arant, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for defendants Ryan and others.

BRYANT, District Judge.

In these related cases complainants attack the validity of an act of Congress known as the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195), and certain regulations of the Secretary of the Interior, the provisions of the Code for the petroleum industry established under the act, upon constitutional grounds.

In the Anding & Panama Refining Company cases, a rule to show cause was issued returnable October 2, calling upon the respondents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases