DOHERTY v. McAULIFFE

No. 3914.

7 F.Supp. 49 (1934)

DOHERTY v. McAULIFFE et al.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 8, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Putnam, Bell, Dutch & Santry, Stoughton Bell, and Arthur F. Ray, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Benjamin H. Chertok, of Boston, Mass., for certain stockholders.

Simon Cohen, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Minnie Rosenfield.

William H. Lewis, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Peter C. Borre.

Alfred Gardner and Gardner, Worcester & Gifford, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant Thomas McAuliffe.

Samuel H. Lewis, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Wm. S. Dana.

Simon Cohen, of Boston, Mass., for defendant Minnie Rosenfield.

G. L. Dillaway, of Boston, Mass., for Charles E. Absolom.

Samuel G. Thorner, of Boston, Mass., pro se.


BREWSTER, District Judge.

This bill of complaint was brought to prevent a multiplicity of suits threatened by holders of stock of the Cities Service Company sold in this state by the complainant, as broker, and to determine the validity of such sales made upon installment plan contracts.

A motion to dismiss was heard and denied by Judge Lowell. The case is now presented on the merits. The essential facts are not in dispute, but in order to fully understand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases