1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 8 F.Supp.
  5. 8 F.Supp. 519 (1934)
 

DAVIS v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. RY. CO.

No. 2029.

8 F.Supp. 519 (1934)

DAVIS v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. RY. CO. et al.

District Court, N. D. Oklahoma.

November 5, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Gibbs, of Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiff.

Coffey, Seaton & Coffey, of Tulsa, Okl., for defendants Clarence Smith and Mrs. Clarence Smith.

Cruce & Satterfield, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co., James M. Kurn, John G. Lonsdale, James M. Kurn and John G. Lonsdale, receivers for St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co., and Felip Portilloz.

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

This action was instituted for the recovery of damages for an alleged injury to plaintiff by reason of the negligence of the defendants. The action was instituted in the District Court of Tulsa county, Okl., and within the time fixed by statute was properly removed to this court by the defendants James M. Kurn and John G. Lonsdale, individually and as receivers for St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, said defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases