1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 6 F.Supp.
  5. 6 F.Supp. 518 (1934)
 

VAN KANNEL REVOLVING DOOR CO. v. GENERAL BRONZE CORP.

Nos. 6967, 6997.

6 F.Supp. 518 (1934)

VAN KANNEL REVOLVING DOOR CO. v. GENERAL BRONZE CORPORATION (two cases).

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 15, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Munn, Anderson, Stanley, Foster & Liddy and T. Hart Anderson, all of New York City (Orson D. Munn and Daniel H. Kane, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Moses & Nolte, of New York City (Charles Neave and Edmund Quincy Moses, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

By consent the two suits were tried together.

They are based on the alleged infringement by the defendant of the following patents. The title to each is in the plaintiff.

The first action is based upon patent No. 1,890,365, issued to Robert L. Blanchard, assignor to Van Kannel Revolving Door Company, the predecessor of the plaintiff herein, for full collapsible panic proof revolving door, granted December 6, 1932, on an application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases