1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 8 F.Supp.
  5. 8 F.Supp. 454 (1934)
 

MISSOURI UTILITIES CO. v. CITY OF CALIFORNIA

No. 622.

8 F.Supp. 454 (1934)

MISSOURI UTILITIES CO. v. CITY OF CALIFORNIA, MO., et al.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, Central Division.

November 2, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fordyce, White, Mayne & Williams, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

L. P. Embry, of California, Mo., for defendants city of California and city officials.

Henry T. Hunt, of Washington, D. C., for defendant Harold L. Ickes, as Federal Emergency Administrator of Public Works.

Bowersock, Fizzell & Rhodes, of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Fairbanks-Morse Const. Co.

A. Z. Patterson, D. C. Chastain, Cyrus Crane, Blatchford Downing, and Samuel W. Liske, all of Kansas City, Mo., amici curiæ.

OTIS, District Judge.

The matters under submission are motions of defendants to dismiss plaintiff's bill.

The facts alleged in and the theory of the bill are as follows:

The city of California is a Missouri municipal corporation. Its population in 1930 was 2,384. On October 30, 1933, an election was held in California to determine whether bonds in a total amount of $100,000 should be issued, the proceeds of which would be used for the construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases