1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 422 (1934)
 

BURKE v. EMSCO DERRICK & EQUIPMENT CO.

7 F.Supp. 422 (1934)

BURKE et al. v. EMSCO DERRICK & EQUIPMENT CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. California, C. D.

July 3, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Ford W. Harris, R. Welton Whann, and Ward D. Foster, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

JAMES, District Judge.

The following will show the conclusions that have been reached on the issues presented in this case. It does not include an extensive discussion of the evidence, or of the patent law. The writing of long opinions by trial judges, in my view, is not of great benefit to the legal profession, for such opinions furnish no binding precedents and only serve to clutter up the printed reports unnecessarily. Besides this, the great congestion of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases