1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 401 (1934)
 

IRVING AIR CHUTE CO. v. SWITLIK PARACHUTE & E. CO.

7 F.Supp. 401 (1934)

IRVING AIR CHUTE CO., Inc., v. SWITLIK PARACHUTE & EQUIPMENT CO.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

April 7, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave, of New York City (Alexander C. Neave, of New York City, Roy R. Rommel, of Washington, D. C., and Charles H. Walker, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, of Jersey City, N. J. (John F. Neary and Daniel L. Morris, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

CLARK, District Judge.

The customary patent case and the customary feeling of futility. That feeling comes from our almost perpetual disagreement with the Patent Office. Because of this continuity in difference, we have held this decision as long as we could without delaying the losing party's opportunity for a hearing in the court above. Either this court or the Patent Office has maintained a high average of error. In fact, the minor patent in the case at bar is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases